ExtraHop named a Leader in the 2025 Forrester Wave™: Network Analysis And Visibility Solutions

Search
  • Platformchevron right
  • Solutionschevron right
  • Modern NDRchevron right
  • Resourceschevron right
  • Companychevron right

DETECTION OVERVIEW

BloodHound Enumeration Activity

Risk Factors

BloodHound has been documented in many security breach reports. Reconnaissance tools can make enumeration relatively easy to perform, but an attacker needs network access to the target Microsoft Active Directory (AD) domain to run BloodHound. Enumeration activity typically does not negatively affect network performance, but attackers can leverage this information to find new targets in an attack campaign.

Category

Reconnaissance
Detection diagram
Next in Reconnaissance: DNS Brute Force

Attack Background

AD stores valuable information about objects (such as users, hosts, groups, organizational units, and sites) and privilege levels. BloodHound is an open-source tool that creates interactive visualizations that map out relationships between objects. A major component of BloodHound are data collectors, such as SharpHound or BloodHound.py, that leverage network protocols such as remote procedure call (RPC), SMB, and LDAP to retrieve data from domain controllers and domain workstations. For example, the data collector runs different types of LDAP queries to retrieve different collections of data, such as all administration accounts or workstations in a domain. BloodHound typically performs enumeration activity with encryption enabled. With these data collections, BloodHound builds visualizations in a user interface where the attacker can identify which AD objects to compromise to gain access to their targets.

Mitigation Options

Apply the principles of least privilege to domain users to reduce the information users can enumerate through scans and tools such as BloodHound

Because securing LDAP servers can be difficult without compromising functionality, monitor and investigate unusual LDAP activity quickly to minimize potential damage

MITRE ATT&CK ID

Associated content

Announcing The Forrester Wave™: Network Analysis And Visibility Solutions, Q4 2025

Network analysis and visibility solutions remain underrepresented in enterprises. Find out why in this preview of a new Wave report.

Report

ExtraHop® Named a Leader in First-Ever Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for Network Detection and Response — ExtraHop

ExtraHop® Named a Leader in First-Ever Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for Network Detection and Response

News

Detections

Visit this resource for more information.

Docs

The 2025 ExtraHop Global Threat Landscape Report: The Alarming Reality of Threat Actor Dwell Time and Deeper Network Access — ExtraHop

This analysis exposes the critical link between an organization's lack of internal visibility and the escalating cost of compromise, demanding an urgent re-evaluation of how core business assets are protected.

Blog

ExtraHop RevealX MITRE ATT&CK Coverage 2024 — ExtraHop

Learn why you need to be wary of the claims certain network detection and response providers make about their coverage against the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

Blog

MITRE ATT&CK - Network Detection & Response with RevealX — ExtraHop

Learn how NDR from RevealX helps security teams detect and investigate more adversary TTPs in the MITRE ATT&CK framework than rule-based tools.

External
Periodic Table of Use Cases

What else can RevealX do for you?